Follow WoWBlips on Twitter
vote down
flag
wow.com - 28 days ago
—
Righteous Defense lays out an intriguing argument for an idea that I still personally can't get behind: paladin stances. The recent changes around patch 3.3 have shined a light on paladin versatility, and basically, paladins are forced to pay the hybrid tax three times over -- because they ...
rhida.ch - 29 days ago
—
rhida.ch —
Warrior tanks go into defensive stance . Druids
shift into bear form . DKs apply frost presence...
. Paladins do not have an equitable ability (Righteous Fury is not, at a nuts and bolts level, the same). Ghostcrawler, want to differentiate the three ...
(more)
The time has come Blizz: give us ...
Reactions
 |
Via WoW: The argument for paladin stances: Righteous Defense lays out an intriguing argument for an id.. http://bit.ly/12PHEQ 29 days ago |
 |
Wow.com argues for paladin "stances". Terrible idea, IMO.The classes are too homogenized as it is. http://tiny.cc/io0BE #warcraft 29 days ago |
Comments
Blog Reactions
Link hard, with a vengeance
Welcome to Spinksville! —
... their locks and not to even go grab some badges in a PUG. Matticus takes another angle and notes that it’s much easier to recruit and gear up a newbie now, so why not widen the recruitment net?
So your guild is breaking up, everyone is all out of enthusiasm, and even the officers are wishing they could just quit. Ferrel discusses how to neatly put the guild to sleep – not a situation anyone likes but these things happen.
And my wtf of the week is wow.com’s post this morning about paladins which notes:
paladins are forced ...
Related Content
